Search for: "Smith v. Fathers House et al" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  Roberts et al. came down with one decision, Pearson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The father maintained that the trial judge should have considered whether it … Paniccia Estate et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Wagler, et al (NFP), a 30-page opinion, Judge Kirsch's dissent begins:Multiple motions. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:17 am by J. Ross Pepper
In some cases, that position can be successful like it was in a recent case from the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Dicus, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
In 2015, for instance, she spoke at a rally opposing California's new strict school vaccination bill, and was later quoted in the Sacramento Bee (David Siders et al.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:56 pm by Frank Pasquale
Melander, et al. also worried (in 2003) that, since “The degree of multiple publication, selective publication, and selective reporting differed between products,” “any attempt to recommend a specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor from the publicly available data only is likely to be based on biased evidence. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
People started running out of the house toward the parked car. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
– Justice Otto Moore of the Colorado Supreme Court, 1956 In this day and age of near constant, twenty-four hour news coverage, accessible through numerous television outlets (to wit, CNN, CSPAN, Fox News, MSNB, et al.), as well as through the more recent medium of internet distribution, access to the inner-workings of our government, on both the state and federal levels, is at an all-time high. [read post]